Applying Consolidated ISBD to electronic resources: similarities and differences with ISBD(ER)

Authors

  • Ana Belén Ríos Hilario Universidad de Salamanca
  • João Guerreiro Universidad de Slamanca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v17i1.3902

Keywords:

Electronic resources description, ISBD (ER), Consolidated ISBD

Abstract

A comparative analysis between the ISBD (ER) and the consolidated ISBD is performed, focusing exclusively on the description of digital documents. The aim of our study is to identify the similarities and differences between the two standards, in order to provide a summary of the changes made in the new uniformed rules. After an introduction which sets out the methodology to follow, the comparison of the rules is carried out. This review is divided into two parts: the first one establishes the historical evolution of both ISBD, while the second one provides the comparison of both form and content. Finally, the conclusions highlight the most important aspects of the comparison and identifies a number of proposals to facilitate the implementation of the consolidated ISBD regarding the description of electronic documents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-30

How to Cite

Ríos Hilario, A. B., & Guerreiro, J. (2011). Applying Consolidated ISBD to electronic resources: similarities and differences with ISBD(ER). Scire: Knowledge Representation and Organization (ISSNe 2340-7042; ISSN 1135-3716), 17(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v17i1.3902

Issue

Vol.17, N.1 (2011)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2011 Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© 1996- . Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.