Library classifications criticisms: universality, postestructuralism and ethics

Authors

  • Daniel Martinez Avila Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • José Augusto Chaves Guimarãe Universidade Estadual Paulista

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v19i2.4081

Keywords:

Library classifications, universality, bias, ethics in knowledge organization and representation, poststructuralism, pragmatism

Abstract

We study library classifications criticisms from a poststructuralist and pragmatist point of view that rejects the idea of universality in knowledge organization systems. From this perspective, we analize the seminal texts on library classifications criticisms and conclude that the seek of neutrality in some of these texts is not only an impossible goal but also a contradiction in the representation of different cultures. Therefore, we suggest the commitment with the goals and the recognition of bias in library classifications as an important device for achieving a transcultural ethics in knowledge organization and representation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Martinez Avila, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Profesor ayudante específico Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

José Augusto Chaves Guimarãe, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Profesor catedrático de universidad. Departamento de Ciencia da informaçao. Universidade Estadual Paulista (Marilia SP Brasil)

Downloads

Published

2013-09-21

How to Cite

Martinez Avila, D., & Chaves Guimarãe, J. A. (2013). Library classifications criticisms: universality, postestructuralism and ethics. Scire: Knowledge Representation and Organization (ISSNe 2340-7042; ISSN 1135-3716), 19(2), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.54886/scire.v19i2.4081

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)