Comparative analysis of the Spanish science and transfer metrics by autonomous communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4859Keywords:
Scientometrics, Patents, Research and Development, Spain, Autonomous CommunitiesAbstract
Spanish scientific production and technology transfer that it entails are constantly growing, and consequently that of the Autonomous Communities as well. However, this does not mean that all the Autonomous Communities evolve in the same way, nor that they all implement the same policies. In this paper we present a comparison of investment in R&D&i, scientific production, and its transfer to the productive fabric of the seventeen Spanish Autonomous Communities in the period 2003-2020. The data used to carry out this work has been extracted from three of the platforms created by the SCImago group: SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJ&CR), SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) and SCImago Patents Rank (SPR) (under development) based on information included in Elsevier's Scopus database and PATSTAT. In total, 1,276,914 primary documents published in the 2003-2020 period have been recovered, signed by authors affiliated to Spanish institutions that have been disaggregated at the level of Autonomous Communities. With them, a battery of indicators of scientific production (12), its technological impact (5) and technology transfer (5) has been generated, in addition to its variation rates.
Downloads
References
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación (ANECA) (s.f.). Evaluación del profesorado. ANE-CA. http://www.aneca.es/Programas-de-evaluacion/Evaluacion-de-profesorado
Altuzarra, Amaia (2019). R&D and patents: is it a two way street? // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 28:2,180-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.1449726
Archambault, Éric; Campbell, David; Gingras, Yves; Lariviére, Vincent (2009). Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60:7, 1320-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062
Bornmann, Lutz; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Leydesdorff, Loet (2012). The new excellence indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. // Journal of informetrics. 6:2, 333-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.006
Buela-Casal, Gualberto; Bermúdez, M. Paz; Sierra, Juan-Carlos; Guillén-Riquelme, Alejandro; Quevedo-Blasco, Raúl (2015). Productividad y eficiencia en investigación por comunidades autónomas españolas según la financiación (2012). // Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud. 6:1, 1-10. http://10.1016/s2171-2069(15)70001-3
Calderón-Garrido, Diego; Gustems-Carnicer, Josep (2018). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica sobre edu-cación musical en el periodo 2007-2016 en revistas incluidas en JCR. // BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació. 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/BiD2018.41.10
Clauset, Aaron; Newman, Mark E.J.; Moore, Cristopher. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks // Physical Review. 70:6, 066111.
De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Corera-Álvarez, Elena; Muñoz-Fernández, Francisco-José; González-Molina, Antonio; Herrero-Solana, Víctor (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach.. // Scientometrics. 73, 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4
De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2012). Liderazgo y excelencia de la ciencia española. // El Profesional de la Información. 21: 2, 125-128. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.01
De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; Bornmann, Lutz; Moed, Henk F. (2013). The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: A promising new approach. // Scientometrics. 97, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1046-0
European Patent Office (2018). Data catalog Patstat global. Versión 5.11. EPO Patstat customers. https://www.epo.org
FECYT (2007). Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica española 1990-2004. Madrid: FECYT, ISBN 84 69050590.
FECYT (2013). Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española 2010. Madrid: FECYT. ISBN 72012070.
FECYT (2014). Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española 2011. Madrid: FECYT, ISBN 720 14 132 1
Gómez-Crisóstomo, Rocío; Luna-Sáez, Rosa-Marina (2022). Cuatro décadas de biblioteconomía y documentación en España: análisis bibliométrico de producción científica. // Revista Españoa de Documentación Cinetífica. 45:3, E334. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2022.3.1878
Guallar, Javier; Pedraza-Jiménez, Rafael; Pérez-Montoro, Mario; Anton, Laura (2021). Curación de contenidos en periodismo. Indicadores y buenas prácticas. // Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 44: 2, e296. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.2.1742
Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; Moed, Henk F.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix. (2021a). New indicators of the technological impact of scientific production. // Journal of Data and Information Science. 6:4, 36-61. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0028
Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; Moed, Henk F.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2021b). A further step forward in measuring journals’ technological factor. // El Profesional de la información. 30: 4, e300406. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.06
Guerrero-Bote, Vicente-Pablo; Sánchez-Jiménez, Rodrigo; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2019). The citation from patents to scientific output revisited: a new approach to the matching Patstat / Scopus. // El Profesional de la Información. 28: 4. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.01
Haba-Osca, Julia; Osca-Lluch, Julia; González-Sala, Francisco (2019). Producción científica española en literatura desde una perspectiva de género a través de Web of Science (1975-2017). // Investigación bibliotecológica. 33: 79, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2019.79.57996
Hanne, Paula J. (2004). Elsevier announces Scopus service. // Information today. March 15. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16494
Hassan-Montero, Y., De-Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2022). SCImago Graphica: a new tool for exploring and vi-sually communicating data. // Profesional de la información. 31:5. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.sep.02
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2021). Estadística sobre Actividades de I+D Año 2020. Datos definitivos. https://www.ine.es/prensa/imasd_2020.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2022). Glosario de Concep-tos/Gastos en actividades de I+D interna. https://www.ine.es/DEFIne/es/concepto.htm?c=4731&op=30060&p=1&n=20
Jefferson, Osmat A..; Jaffe, Adam; Ashton, Doug.; Warren, Ben; Koellhofer, Deniz; Dulleck, Uwe; Bilder, Geoff; Ballagh, Aa-ron; Moe, John.; DiCuccio, Michael; Ward, Karl; Dolby, Ke-vin; Jefferson, Richard A. (2018). Mapping the global in-fluence of published research on industry and innovation. // Nature biotechnology. 36:1, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0818-772a
Kang, Byeongwoo; Tarasconi, Gianluca. (2016). Patstat revisi-ted: Suggestions for better usage. // World patent information. 46, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2016.06.001
Leydesdorff, Loet; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P. (2010). Journal maps on the basis of Scopus da-ta: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI. // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61:2, 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21250
Martínez, Catalina; Bares, Lydia (2018). The link between technology transfer and international extension of university patents: Evidence from Spain. // Science and Public Policy. 45: 6, 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy008
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (s.f.). Sistema de Informa-ción de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SICTI). https://www.ciencia.gob.es/Estrategias-y-Planes/Sistema-de-Informacion-sobre-Ciencia--Tecnologia-e-Innovacion--SICTI-/Sistema-de-Informacion-de-Ciencia-Tecnologia-e-Innovacion-SICTI.html
Moreira-Mieles, Liggia; Morales-Intriago, Juan-Carlos; Crespo-Gascón, Sofía; Guerrero-Casado, José. (2020). Caracteri-zación de la producción científica de Ecuador en el periodo 2007-2017 en Scopus. // Investigación bibliotecológica. 34:82, 141-157. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2020.82.58082
Morillo, Fernanda; De Filippo, Daniela. (2009). Descentraliza-ción de la actividad científica: el papel determinante de las regiones centrales: el caso de Madrid. // Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 32:3, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2009.3.684
OEPM (2020). La OEPM en cifras. https://www.oepm.es/export/sites/oepm/comun/documentos_relaciona-dos/Publicaciones/Folletos/La_OEPM_en_Cifras_2020.pdf
Pickering, Bobby (2004). Elsevier prepares Scopus to rival ISI Web of science. // Information world review, 200. http://140.234.252.185/c/articles/12723322/elsevier-prepares-scopus-rival-isi-web-science
Rehn, Catharina; Kronman, Ulf (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library. Version 1.05. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1480.9447
Repiso, Rafael; Moreno-Delgado, Alicia (2022). Spanish scientific output in Communication indexed on Web of Science: contextualization and presence in the Shanghai Ranking. // El Profesional de la Información. 31:1. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.ene.19
Romo-Fernández, Luz-María; López-Pujalte, Cristina; Guerre-ro-Bote, Vicente-Pablo.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2011). Analysis of Europe’s scientific production on renewable energies. // Renewable energy. 36: 9, 2529-2537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.02.001
SCImago (2022a). SJ&CR. SCImago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com
SCImago (2022b). SIR. SCImago Institutions Rankings. http://www.scimagoir.com
SCImago (2022c). SCImago Graphica. https://graphica.app/
Singh, Vivev-Kumar.; Singh, Prashasti.; Karmakar, Mousumi.; Leta, Jacqueline.; Mayr, Philipp (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. // Scientometrics. 126:6, 5113-5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2010). Introduction and comparative study of the new scientific journals citation indicators in Journal Citation Reports and Scopus = Introducción y estudio comparativo de los nuevos indicadores de citación sobre revistas científicas en Journal Citation Reports. // El Profesional de la Información. 19:2, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2010.mar.12
Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. // Scientometrics, 84:2, 523-538.
Waltman, Ludo; Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Noyons, Ed. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. // Journal of informetrics. 4:4, 629-35.
WIPO (s.f.). WIPO IP Statistics Data Center. https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/keyindex.htm.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1970 Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2007- . Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.
