O escritório de comunicação científica como perspectiva de atuação para bibliotecas universitárias
perspectivas de actuación para las bibliotecas universitarias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4917Palavras-chave:
Biblioteca universitária, Comunicação científica, Escritório de comunicação cient´´íficaResumo
Teniendo en cuenta los actuales desafíos que enfrentan las universidades, como la obligación de rendir cuentas a la sociedad, la necesidad de una mayor visibilidad científica, la alta competencia a través de los rankings internacionales y el avance de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, se analiza la figura de la oficina de comunicación científica en el ámbito de la biblioteca universitaria. Para ello, se parte de los modelos de comunicación científica existentes para llegar a productos y servicios de una oficina de comunicación científica a través del análisis de una muestra de quince oficinas de comunicación científica existentes en bibliotecas de universidades consideradas de excelencia en cuatro rankings universitarios internacionales. Los resultados evidencian, en diferentes etapas de desarrollo, actividades relacionadas con el acceso abierto, los derechos de autor, la gestión de datos de investigación, los identificadores de autor, el impacto de la investigación, las métricas, la publicación y los repositorios. Se concluye que la identificación y sistematización de las iniciativas relacionadas con los servicios de apoyo a la comunicación científica ubicados en las bibliotecas con el fin de estructurar oficinas de este tipo, a partir de la realidad estudiada, llevan a pensar en la necesidad de que la formación del bibliotecario contemple una sólida base en comunicación científica (y con una fuerte base en la sociología de la ciencia), no solo desde un punto de vista normativo, sino a partir de una experiencia investigativa efectiva que permita al bibliotecario ponerse en la posición del investigador y, de esta manera, tener claridad sobre los aspectos que requieren su apoyo.
Downloads
Referências
Atkinson, J. (2016). Academic libraries and research support: an overview. // Atkinson, J. (ed.). Quality and the academic library: reviewing, assessing and enhancing service provision. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. 978-0-12-802105-7. p. 135-141.
Bardin, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004.
Bell, S.; Foster, N. F.; Gibbons, S. (2005). Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. // Reference Services Review. 33:3 (2005) 283-290.
Björk, B. C. (2005a). A lifecycle model of the scientific communication process. // Learned Publishing. 18:3 (2005a) 165-176.
Björk, B. C. (2005b). Scientific communication life-cycle model. // Hanken Svenska handelshögskolan. (2005b) 1-39.
Chan, D. L. H.; Kwok, C. S. Y.; Yip, S. K. F. (2005). Changing roles of reference librarians: the case of the HKUST institutional repository. // Reference Services Review. 33:3 (2005) 268-282.
Coalition for Networked Information. (2012). Institutional Strategies and Platforms for Scholarly Publishing. 2012. https://www.cni.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/CNI-Executive-Roundtable-Report-December-2012.pdf. (2022-05-22).
Cummings, A. M. et al. (1992). University libraries and scholarly communication: a study prepared for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Bingham: Haworth Press, 1992.
Czerniewicz, L. (2013). Power and politics in a changing scholarly communication landscape. Proceedings of the 34th International Association of University Libraries Conference: Cape Town, 2013. Cape Town: IATUL, 2013. 1-12.
Fearon Junior, D. et al. (2013). Research data management services. Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2013.
Filipe, A. B. P. S. (2020). A avaliação da informação científica: das métricas tradicionais às complementares. Coimbra: 2020. Tesis de Maestría.
Fjällbrant, N. (1997). Scholarly communication: historical development and new possibilities. Proceedings of the 18th International Association of University Libraries Conference: Trondheim, 1997. Trondheim: 1997. 1-25.
Fruin, C. (2017). Organization and delivery of scholarly communication services by academic and research libraries in the United Kingdom: observations from across the pond. // Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 5 (2017) 1-22.
Garvey, W. D.; Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: empirical findings for Psychology. // Information Storage and Retrieval. 8:3 (1972). 123-136.
Gibson, S. S. (1982). Scientific societies and exchange: a facet of the history of scientific communication. // Journal of Library History. 17:2 (1982) 144-163.
Gilman, I. (2013). Library scholarly communication programs: legal and ethical considerations. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2013. 978-1-78063-383-1.
González-Solar, L. (2016). La biblioteca universitaria orientada a la investigación: propuesta de um modelo de servicio centrado en el usuario desde la perspectiva del marketing. Coruña: 2016. Tesis Doctoral.
González-Solar, L. (2017). La biblioteca universitaria como elemento clave en la estrategia de investigación de la universidad. // Páginas a&b: arquivos e bibliotecas. 7:7 (2017) 105-125.
Hahn, K. L. (2008). Research library publishing services: new options for university publishing. Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2008.
Helge, K. S.; Tmava, A. M.; Zerangue, A. R. (2019). Sustaining and enhancing the scholarly communications department. Santa Barbara: Denver, 2019. 978-1-44086-699-9.
Hudson-Vitale, C. et al. (2017). Data curation. Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2017. http://publications.arl.org/Data-Curation-SPEC-Kit-354/ (2022-03-01).
Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: a model for 2020. // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 51:14 (2000) 1279-1283.
Hurd, J. M. (2004). Scientific communication: new roles and new players. // Science & Technology Libraries. 25:1-2 (2004) 5-22.
Jubb, M. (2016). Libraries and the support of university research. // Atkinson, J. (ed.). Quality and the academic library: reviewing, assessing and enhancing service provision. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. 978-0-12-802105-7. 143-156.
Kenney, A. R. (2014) Leveraging the liaison model: from defining 21st century research libraries to implementing 21st century research universities. // Ithaka S+R. 11 (2014).
Kutay, S. (2014). Advancing digital repository services for faculty primary research assets: an exploratory study. // Journal of Academic Librarianship. 40:6 (2014) 642-649.
Leonard, M.; Bennett, D. B. (2013). Responsible conduct of research training. 2013. http://publications.arl.org/Responsible-Conduct-Research-Training-SPEC-Kit-336/ (2022-03-02).
Library Publishing Coalition. (2022). Whats is library publishing? https://librarypublishing.org/. (2022-02-05).
Malenfant, K. J. Leading change in the system of scholarly communication: a case study of engaging liaison librarians for outreach to faculty. // College & Research Libraries. 71:1 (2010) 63-76.
Marcum, D.; Schonfeld, R.; Thomas, S. (2015). Office of scholarly communication: scope, organizational placement, and planning in ten research libraries. New York: Ithaka S+R, 2015.
Maricato, J. M.; Martins, D. L. (2017). Altmetria: complexidades, desafios e novas formas de mensuração e compreensão da comunicação científica na web social. // Biblios. 68:68 (2017) 48-68.
Maron, N. et al. (2019). Creating a more inclusive future for scholarly communications: ACRL’s new research agenda for scholarly communications and the research environment. Proceedings of the 23th International Conference on Electronic Publishing: Marseille, 2019. Marseille: Open Edition Press, 2019. 1-16.
Marra, P. S. C. (2012). O papel das bibliotecas universitárias na comunicação científica: um estudo sobre os repositórios institucionais. // Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação. 17:2 (2012) 174-194.
Milne, P. (1999). Scholarly communication: crisis, response and future: a review of the literature. // Australian Academic & Research Libraries. 30:2, (1999) 70-88.
Mueller, S. P. M. (2007). Literatura científica, comunicação científica e ciência da informação. // Toutain, L. M. B. B. (org.). Para entender a Ciência da Informação. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2007. 978-8-52320-477-8. 125-144.
Naim, K.; Stranack, K.; Willinsky, J. (2017). Open access publishing cooperative study: final report. Public Knowledge Project, 2017.
Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Navigating the rising metrics tide in the 21st century: which way for academic librarians in support of researchers in sub-Saharan Africa? // South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 2304-8263. 84:2 (2018) 1-13.
Park, J. H.; Shim, J. (2011). Exploring how library publishing services facilitate scholarly communication. // Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 43:1 (2011) 76-89.
Perry, A. M. et al. (2011). Libraries as journal publishers. // Serials Review. 37:3 (2011) 196-204.
Radom, R.; Feltner-Reichert, M.; Stringer-Stanback, K. (2012). SPEC Kit 332: Organization of Scholarly Communication Services. Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2012. 978-1-59407-890-3.
Rao, Y. S. (2018). Scholarly communication cycle: SWOT analysis. Proceedings of International Conference on Scholarly Communication, Open-access Publishing and Ethics: Vijayawada, 2018. Balrampur: AIJR Publisher, 2018. 50-68.
Reitz, J. M. (2020). Subject specialist. // Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. (2020). https://odlis.abc-clio.com/odlis_s.html (2020-09-21).
Reitz, J. M. (2021). Open access. // Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. https://products.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_o.aspx (2021-02-18).
Schmidt, L.; Boczar, J. (2021). Designing a flexible outreach program for scholarly communication and copyright services: a modular roadshow for the university of South Florida. // College & Research Libraries News. 2150-6698. 82:5 (2021) 233-236.
Silva, F. R.; Alves, F. M. M.; Barreiras, M. I. S. (2019). Comunicação científica: visão diacrônica de alguns subsídios teóricos. // Revista Fontes Documentais. 2:1 (2019) 67-87.
Siqueira, L. P. B. P. (2015). Direitos autorais e comunicação científica: desafios para bibliotecas. // Bibliotecas Universitárias: pesquisas, experiências e perspectivas. 2 (2015) 29-42.
Spinak, E.; Packer, A. L. (2015). 350 anos de publicação científica: desde o “Journal des Sçavans” e “Philosophical Transactions” até o SciELO. // SciELO em Perspectiva. (2015). https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2015/03/05/350-anos-de-publicacao-cientifica-desde-o-journal-des-scavans-e-philosophical-transactions-ate-o-scielo (2020-09-30).
Søndergaard, T. F.; Andersen, J.; Hjørland, B. (2003). Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information revising and updating the UNISIST model. // Journal of Documentation. 59:3 (2003) 278-320.
Taylor, L. N. et al. (2017). Libraries, presses, and publishing. Washinton: Association of Research Libraries, 2017.
Thorin, S. E. (2006). Global changes in scholarly communication. // Ching, H. S.; Poon, P. W. T.; McNaught, C. eLearning and digital publishing. Springer: Dordrecht, 2006. 221-240.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1971). UNISIST: Study report on the feasibility of a World Science Information System. Paris: UNESCO, 1971.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Scholarly communications: open access for researchers. Paris: UNESCO, 2015.
Vanz, S. A. S.; Santin, D. M.; Pavão, C. M. G. (2018). A bibliometria e as novas atribuições profissionais nas bibliotecas universitárias. // InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação. 9:1 (2018) 4-24.
Weaver, B.; Richardson, J. (2021). Reinventing library research support services at Griffith University. // Fernández Marcial, V.; González-Solar, L. (2021). Cases on research support services in academic libraries. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2021. 978-1-79984-546-1 267-289, 2021.
Xia, J. (2009). Library publishing as a new model of scholarly communication. // Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 1710-1166. 40:4 (2009) 370-383.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2007- . Los autores y autoras conservan sus derechos de autor, aunque ceden a la revista de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación (reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y transformación) y garantizan a esta el derecho de primera publicación de su trabajo, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la licencia CC BY-NC-ND. Los autores aceptan la responsabilidad legal de cumplir plenamente con los códigos éticos y leyes apropiadas, y de obtener todos los permisos de derecho de autor debidos. Se permite y se anima a los autores y autoras a difundir electrónicamente la versión editorial (versión publicada por la editorial) en la página web personal del autor y en el repositorio de la institución a la que pertenece.
