Observação inspirada em revisão por pares
uma ferramenta estratégica para validar a quali-dade da pedagogia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v18i1.4996Palavras-chave:
Observação por pares, Revisão por pares, Ensino Superior, QualidadeResumo
Este trabalho examina a convergência entre a observação de pares na docência no ensino superior e o processo de revisão por pares na publicação científica. Realizámos um estudo preliminar para analisar as estratégias utilizadas por professores do ensino superior ao avaliar práticas de ensino, por meio da observação, e comparámos esses resultados com o rigor da revisão por pares no contexto da publicação científica. O objetivo central é comparar práticas de qualidade em dois ecossistemas distintos: o ambiente académico, onde colegas de ensino observam e avaliam métodos de ensino, e o campo da publicação científica, onde revisores por pares avaliam a qualidade e originalidade da investigação. Este estudo é baseado em uma revisão da literatura, enquadrando a análise em parâmetros descritivos. Os resultados mostram semelhanças na importância da reflexão crítica e análise rigorosa, evidenciando uma convergência nas perceções dos participantes sobre a necessidade de feedback construtivo e orientação específica para promover o desenvolvimento profissional. Ambos os processos contribuem significativamente para a qualidade e o progresso nas suas respetivas esferas, destacando a importância de práticas eficazes de avaliação em ambientes académicos e científicos.
Downloads
Referências
Bell, A.; Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. // Higher Education. 55:6, 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
Bleiler-Baxter, S. K.; Hart, J. B.; O.P., S. C. A. W. (2020). Teaching TRIOs: Using Peer Observation to Initiate Department Change. // PRIMUS. 31:3–5, 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1772918
Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. // Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 45:1, 197–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112
Cosh, J. (1998). Peer Observation in Higher Education-A Reflective Approach. // Innovations in Education and Training International. 35:2, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800980350211
Crozier, F.; Curvale, B.; Hénard, F. (2005). Quality convergence study: a contribution to the debates on quality and convergence in the European higher education area. Helsinki: European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
Elton, L. (2009). Continuing Professional Development in Higher Education: The role of the scholarship of teaching and learning. // Arts & Humanities in Higher Education. 8: 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022209339
Grunig, S. D. (1997). Research, reputation, and resources: The effect of research activity on perceptions of undergraduate education and institutional resource acquisition. // Journal of Higher Education. 68:1, 17–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1997.11778976
Hames, I. (2007). Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L.; Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? // Studies in Higher Education. 29:4, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236380
Hammersley-Fletcher, L.; Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. // Studies in Higher Education. 30:2, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043358
Hatzipanagos, S.; Lygo-Baker, S. (2006). Teaching observations: A meeting of minds. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228632667
Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. // Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 29:2,183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130387
Huston, T.; Weaver, C. L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. // Innovative Higher Education. 33:1, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9061-9
Kocur, R. (2021). Collaborative Peer Observation of Teaching in Higher Education: Best Practices Review and Recommendations. // Christian Business Academy Review. 16:1. https://doi.org/10.69492/cbar.v16i1.582
Lock, S. (1985). A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press.
Lock, S.; Smith, J. (1990). What do peer reviewers do? // JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 263:10, 1341–1343. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100045006
Miranda, J. P.; Batista, M.; Duarte, C.; Sanches, T. (2021). Interdisciplinary class observation in higher education: lessons learned from the professional development experience of four teachers. // MDPI Education Sciences. 11: 706. https://doi:10.3390/educsci11110706
OCDE (2020). The power of observation: Learning from and with teachers. // OECD Education and Skills Today. https://oecdedutoday.com/power-observation-learning-from-with-teachers/
O’Leary, M.; Price, D. (2016). Peer observation as a springboard for teacher learning. In Reclaiming lesson observation: supporting excellence in teacher learning (pp. 114–123). London, UK: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315621838
Shortland, S. (2004). Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance? // Journal of Further and Higher Education. 28:2, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000206778
Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors retain their copyright, but transfer the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) to the journal in a non-exclusive way and guarantee the right to the first publication of their work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subjected to the license CC BY-NC-ND. Authors take whole personal responsibility on fulfilling all the appropiate ethical codes and laws, and obtaining all the necessary copyright permissions regarding their articles. Institutional and self- archiving is allowed and encouraged.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© 2007- . Los autores y autoras conservan sus derechos de autor, aunque ceden a la revista de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación (reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y transformación) y garantizan a esta el derecho de primera publicación de su trabajo, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la licencia CC BY-NC-ND. Los autores aceptan la responsabilidad legal de cumplir plenamente con los códigos éticos y leyes apropiadas, y de obtener todos los permisos de derecho de autor debidos. Se permite y se anima a los autores y autoras a difundir electrónicamente la versión editorial (versión publicada por la editorial) en la página web personal del autor y en el repositorio de la institución a la que pertenece.
