Perceptions on mobile information among undergraduates before and after Covid-19

some comparisons

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v18i1.4941

Keywords:

Mobile learning, mobile information literacy, qualitative research, Portugal, Spain, Focus groups, Case studies

Abstract

A comparative analysis of Social Sciences undergraduates’ perceptions of information literacy (IL) and the use/inclusion of mobile technologies (MT) at the universities of Granada (Spain) and ISPA (Lisboa) before and after the Covid-19 pandemics. An exploratory socio-constructive focus group methodology was carried out based on a sample of eighteen Psychology and Education undergraduates, in the final year of their studies (May 2022). We implemented two focus groups, one in each country. Undergraduates experienced significant gaps, especially in IL knowledge and MT skills. They also perceived attitudinal and technological limitations in their teachers. Morever, there are some differences in attitudes towards MT inclusion in the processes of teaching and learning, according to the context. In this regard, Spanish undergraduates showed better skills and Portuguese ones a higher level of self-perception. Some shortages derived from the Covid-19 pandemic emerge, since there is a growing body of evidence on both the need for student-teacher closeness and the technical limitations of some teacher. After this critical situation, an open-to-experience mentality on the part of all the stakeholders is necessary. Due to the qualitative methodology, we have implemented, the research is limited to a specific sector to be analyzed (Social Sciences undergraduates belonging to the last pregraduate year). Academic, educational institutions and teachers (responsible for the training of future generations) must strive to understand the scope of mobile teaching and the possibilities of mobile devices to increase student’s motivations and to acquire basic skills too. To reflect on this situation turns into a priority to optimize the teaching-learning processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acocella, I.; Cataldi, S. (2020). Using focus groups: Theory, methodology, practice. Sage.

Aidoo, B.; Macdonald, M. A.; Vesterinen, V. M.; Pétursdóttir, S.; Gísladóttir, B. (2022). Transforming teaching with ICT using the flipped classroom approach: Dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. // Education Sciences. 12:6, 421. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060421

Ali, M. K.; Maksum, H. (2020). Utilization of e-learning-based ICT learning using the Google Classroom application during the Covid-19 pandemic. // Journal of Education Research and Evaluation. 4:4, 373-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29181

Alubthane, F.; ALYoussef, I. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ views about effective use of the Whatsapp application in online classrooms. // Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET. 20:1, 44-52.

Annamalai, N. (2018). How do we know what is happening in Whatsapp: a case study investigating pre-service teachers’ online activity. // Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 15:2, 207-225. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.2.8

Aharony, N.; Gur, H. (2019). The relationships between personality, perceptual, cognitive and technological variables and students’ level of information literacy. // Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 51:2, 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742450

Ata, R.; Cevik, M. (2019). Exploring relationships between Kolb’s learning styles and mobile learning readiness of pre-service teachers: A mixed study. // Education and Information Technologies. 24:2, 1351-1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9835-y

Bäcklund, J.; Hugo, M.; Ericson, K. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ experiences of the transition from analogue to digital learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. // Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 80:2, 273. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.273

Baran, B.; Fiğen, A. T. (2014). An investigation of university students’ information literacy self-efficacy perceptions by using decision tree method. // Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES). 47:2, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001341

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2021). Exploring university students’ intention to use mobile learning: A research model approach. // Education and information technologies. 26:1, 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10267-4

Camilleri, M. A.; Camilleri, A. C. (2022). Learning from anywhere, anytime: Utilitarian motivations and facilitating conditions for mobile learning. // Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09608-8

Chen, C. H.; Tsai, C. C. (2021). In-service teachers' conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: Tendency towards student-centered learning. // Computers & Education. 170, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104224

Coe, R.; Waring, M.; Hedges, L. V.; Ashley, L. D. (Eds.). (2021). Research methods and methodologies in education. Sage.

Crompton, H.; Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. // Computers & Education. 123, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007

Danner, M. J.; Pickering, J. W.; Paredes, T. M. (2018). Using focus groups to listen, learn, and lead in higher education. Stylus Publishing.

Dodds, S.; Hess, A. C. (2020). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for transformative service research. // Journal of Service Management. 32:2, 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153

Fagan, M. H. (2019). Factors influencing student acceptance of mobile learning in higher education. // Computers in the Schools. 36:2, 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2019.1603051

Farley, H.; Murphy, A.; Johnson, C.; Carter, B.; Lane, M.; Midgley, W.; ... & Koronios, A. (2015). How do students use their mobile devices to support learning? A case study from an Australian regional university. // Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2015:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jime.a

Hafour, M. F. (2022). The effects of MALL training on preservice and in-service EFL teachers’ perceptions and use of mobile technology. // ReCALL. 6, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000015

Hossain, S. F.; Xi, Z.; Nurunnabi, M.; Anwar, B. (2022). Sustainable academic performance in higher education: A mixed method approach. // Interactive Learning Environments. 30:4, 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1680392

Huang, Y. M.; Liao, Y. W.; Huang, S. H.; Chen, H. C. (2014). Jigsaw-based cooperative learning approach to improve learning outcomes for mobile situated learning. // Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 17:1, 128-140.

Huang, R.; Li, B.; Zhou, L. (2016). Information literacy instruction in Chinese universities: MOOCs versus the traditional approach. // Library Hi Tech. 34:2, 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2016-0013

Kearney, M.; Maher, D. (2019). Mobile learning in pre-service teacher education: Examining the use of professional learning networks. // Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 35:1. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4073

Kearney, K. S.; Damron, R.; Sohoni, S. (2015). Observing engineering student teams from the organization behavior perspective using linguistic analysis of student reflections and focus group interviews. // Advances in Engineering Education. 4:3, 3.

Kim, E. J.; Kim, J. J.; Han, S. H. (2021). Understanding student acceptance of online learning systems in higher education: Application of social psychology theories with consideration of user innovativeness. // Sustainability. 13:2, 896-910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020896

Krouska, A.; Troussas, C.; Sgouropoulou, C. (2022). Mobile game-based learning as a solution in COVID-19 era: Modeling the pedagogical affordance and student interactions. // Education and Information Technologies. 27:1, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10672-3

Krueger, R. A.; Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Latham, D.; Gross, M.; Witte, S. (2013). Preparing teachers and librarians to collaborate to teach 21st century skills: Views of LIS and education faculty. // School Library Research, 16.

Lin, T. J. (2021). Exploring the differences in Taiwanese university students’ online learning task value, goal orientation, and self-efficacy before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. // The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 30:3, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00553-1

Liu, I. F. (2022). Gamified mobile learning: effects on English learning in technical college students. // Computer Assisted Language Learning. 1, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2080717

Marques, M. M.; Pombo, L. (2021). The impact of teacher training using mobile augmented reality games on their professional development. // Education Sciences. 11:8, 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080404

Martin, J. (2013). Refreshing information literacy: Learning from recent British information literacy models. // Communications in Information Literacy. 7:2, 6. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.142

Matsiola, M.; Spiliopoulos, P.; Tsigilis, N. (2022). Digital storytelling in sports narrations: Employing audiovisual tools in sport journalism higher education course. // Education Sciences. 12:1, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010051

Milenkova, V.; Peicheva, D.; Keranova, D.; Nikolova, V.; Marinov, M.; Kyosev, Z.; ... & Lendzhova, V. (2021, July). Digital media and COVID-19: Challenges for people’s consolidation during pandemic crises. // International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, Cham. 539-546.

Mingyue, F.; Ndavi, J. W.; Qalati, S. A.; Huang, L.; Zhengjia, P. (2022). Applying the time continuum model of motivation to explain how major factors affect mobile learning motivation: A comparison of SEM and fsQCA. // Online Information Review. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2021-0226

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. // Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. 7:1, 23-48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Moore, C.; Black, J.; Glackin, B.; Ruppel, M.; Watson, E. (2015). Integrating information literacy, the POGIL method, and iPads into a foundational studies program. // The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41:2, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.12.006

Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Sage.

Morgan. D. L.; Krueger, R. A.; King, J. A. (1998). The focus group kit. Sage.

Mullins, M. H. (2017). Actively teaching research methods with a process oriented guided inquiry learning approach. // Journal of Teaching in Social Work. 37:4, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2017.1347122

Naresh, R. (2020). Education after COVID-19 crisis based on ICT tools. // Purakala. 31:1, 464-468. https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2020.119046

Ng, E. M. (2016). Fostering pre-service teachers' self-regulated learning through self-and peer assessment of wiki projects. // Computers & Education. 98, 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.015

Nikou, S. A.; Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance. // Computers in Human Behavior. 68, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020

Pinto, M.; Mariscal, D. C.; Segura, A. (2021). Experiences of information literacy and mobile technologies amongst undergraduates in times of COVID: A qualitative approach. // Aslib Journal of Information Management. 74:2, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2020-0333

Plank, C.; Dixon, H.; Ward, G. (2014). Student voices about the role feedback plays in the enhancement of their learning. // Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online). 39:9, 98-110. https://doi/10.3316/ielapa.693286778209713

Salas-Rueda, R. A.; Castañeda-Martínez, R.; Eslava-Cervantes, A. L.; Alvarado-Zamorano, C. (2022). Teachers’ perception about MOOCs and ICT during the COVID-19 pandemic. // Contemporary Educational Technology. 14:1, ep343. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11479

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C.; Olmos-Migueláñez, S.; García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. // Computers in Human Behavior. 55, 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C.; Hernández-García, Á.; García-Peñalvo, F. J.; Chaparro-Peláez, J.; Olmos-Migueláñez, S. (2019). Break the walls! Second-order barriers and the acceptance of mLearning by first-year pre-service teachers. // Computers in Human Behavior. 95, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.019

Schina, D.; Valls-Bautista, C.; Borrull-Riera, A.; Usart, M.; Esteve-González, V. (2021). An associational study: Preschool teachers’ acceptance and self-efficacy towards Educational Robotics in a pre-service teacher training program. // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 18:1, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00264-z

Silva, I. S.; Veloso, A. L.; Keating, J. B. (2014). Focus group: Considerações teóricas e metodológicas. // Revista Lusófona de Educação. (26), 175-189.

Sitar-Taut, D. A.; Mican, D. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance and use in higher education during social distancing circumstances: An expansion and customization of UTAUT2. // Online Information Review. 45:5, 1000-1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0017

Sung, Y. T.; Chang, K. E.; Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. // Computers & Education. 94, 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008

Udenze, S.; Oshionebo, B. (2020). Investigating ‘WhatsApp’ for collaborative learning among undergraduates. // Üsküdar Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi Etkileşim. 5, 24-50. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2020.5.92

Wong, K. M. (2021). “A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it” by Lee and Hannafin (2016): an international perspective. // Educational Technology Research and Development. 69:1, 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5

Zhonggen, Y.; Xiaozhi, Y. (2019). An extended technology acceptance model of a mobile learning technology. // Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 27:3, 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22111

Zou, D.; Zhang, R.; Xie, H.; Wang, F. L. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. // Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 37:2, 152-170. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-3617

Downloads

Published

2024-06-14

How to Cite

Caballero Mariscal, D., Lopes, C. ., Antunes, M. L., Sanches, T., & Segura, A. (2024). Perceptions on mobile information among undergraduates before and after Covid-19: some comparisons. Ibersid: Journal of Information and Documentation Systems (ISSNe 2174-081X; ISSN 1888-0967), 18(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v18i1.4941

Issue

Section

Articles